May 21, 2008...3:46 pm

RYAN’S BOLD PLAN

Jump to Comments

This is what is known as leadership.

U.S. Rep Paul Ryan of Wisconsin’s 1st Congressional District has proposed a bold plan to take on the looming twin crises facing Medicare and Social Security as well as the health care system and the tax code.

In an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Ryan writes the following:

According to the Congressional Budget Office, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and the rest of government will consume nearly 40% of the economy by the time my three young children reach my age (38). This will require more than doubling the average tax burden of the past 40 years just to keep the government afloat. Continuing down this path will eventually strangle our economy.

This is a crisis, folks, which threatens to bankrupt our country and one which we cannot just keep raising taxes to avert. This is the effective tax rate of 84 percent referred to in the debate over Social Security reform just a few years ago. 84 percent. That’s a taxpayer sending 84 cents out of every dollar to government to be transferred to some taxeater in the form of a transfer payment.

Thanks to cowardly politicians on both sides of the aisle, including those wishing to avoid taking a position because of future elections — can’t you hear the campaign commercials now? “Sen. Battson D. Belfrey (with a tip of the cap to the late Jeff MacNelly). He wants to kill Social Security. Starve Grandma. Feed her Mighty Dog for Seniors. Take away your Social Security. Stop him. Vote Democrat” — this issue has been punted down the road again and again. It’s become the ultimate political football.

That, by the way, includes President Bush, who after winning a landslide re-election as well as having larger Republican majorities in both Houses of Congress in 2005-06, proposed a reasonable reform to Social Security then never used his political capital to advance his plan. Of course, his inability to articulate ideas didn’t help matters, but Bush chose to waste his political capital pushing Harriet Miers for the U.S. Supreme Court and the idiotic amnesty for illegal aliens.

Then November 2006 came around and with the Democrats in control of Congress, no reform that didn’t include a massive tax hike had a chance of even being discussed. Talk about missed opportunities.

Now Ryan is realistic that as a member of the minority party, his plan has no chance of being debated in Congress, but by offering it, the plan can be debated by the public.

Here’s what it entails:

For Social Security:

Workers under 55 will have the option of investing over one-third of their current Social Security taxes into personal retirement accounts. These personal accounts are likely to grow faster than the traditional benefit. They are also the property of the individual, and are thus fully inheritable. The bill includes a guarantee that no one’s total Social Security benefits from the personal accounts will be less than if he had chosen to say in the current system.

Combined with a more realistic plan for growth in Social Security benefits, and an eventual increase in the retirement age, the Social Security program can thus become sustainable for the long term.

For Medicaid and Medicare:

The bill modernizes Medicaid by giving states maximum flexibility to tailor their Medicaid programs to the specific needs of their populations. It also allows Medicaid recipients to avail themselves of the health-coverage options open to everyone else through the tax-credit option.

The bill secures the existing Medicare program for those over 55 – so Americans can receive the benefits they planned for throughout most of their working lives. Those 55 and younger will, when they retire, receive an annual payment of up to $9,500 to purchase health coverage – either from a list of Medicare-certified plans, or any plan in the individual market, in any state.

The payment is adjusted for inflation and based on income, with low-income individuals receiving greater support and a funded medical savings account.

For health insurance (the liberals will hate this because it removes the cost from third parties, one of the factors which is driving up costs, since the end user rarely has to pay for anything):

The bill provides universal access to affordable health insurance, by shifting the ownership of health coverage from the government and employers to individuals. It provides a refundable tax credit – $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families – to purchase coverage. Individuals will be able to buy insurance offered by any provider in any state – not just the one where they live – and carry it with them if they move or change jobs.

This will encourage, and enable, people to shop for the coverage best suited to their needs and financial circumstances. Insurance companies will also have an incentive to diversify coverage at competitive prices. The active participation of individuals and families in a national, competitive market will restrain health-care costs.

The plan also establishes transparency in health-care price and quality data, so this critical information is readily available before someone needs health services. It also encourages the adoption of health information technology.

On reforming the federal tax structure:

The current federal tax code is complex, burdensome and discourages economic growth. It cannot be fixed with incremental changes; it needs a complete overhaul.

To accomplish this goal, the bill first of all offers individuals a choice of how to pay their taxes – either through the existing law, or through a simplified code with a tax return that fits on a postcard, just two rates and virtually no special tax deductions, credits or exclusions (except the health-care tax credit). Taxpayers themselves choose which code serves them better.

The rates in the simplified code are 10% on income up to $100,000 for joint filers ($50,000 for single filers); and 25% on taxable income above these amounts. There is also a generous standard deduction and personal exemption totaling $39,000 for a family of four. The alternative minimum tax is eliminated. And to promote long-term investment in economic growth, taxes on capital gains, dividends and estates are also eliminated.

On the business side, the bill gets rid of our uncompetitive corporate tax – currently the second highest in the industrialized world – and replaces it with a business consumption tax of 8.5%, which is half the average industrialized world rate.

1 Comment

  • I continue to be amazed at why some folks urge the commoners to invest there retirement money in some company, yet say nothing about having the US Government invest our Social Security fund money in a similar manner. After all, wouldn’t people so employed, be in a better position to protect our future than to have each of us play the “crap shoot” hoping that we are picking the right Companies?

    Dan Kanoza

Leave a Reply